paraka: Megan thinking about pictures on the board (N3-M-Thinking)
paraka ([personal profile] paraka) wrote2008-04-06 01:01 pm

Fandom Meta

So last night I was talking with [livejournal.com profile] paradise_city about incest fic. And well, it led me to a question, and I'd really like to hear what my flist has to say about it.

Fandom has a lot of different kinds of relationships portrayed, and a lot of them are outside of things that we've seen or thought we might enjoy (reading or in RL) before we came to fandom. Some of them are/were outside our moral code. Some things that we used to think we wrong, we may now think of as right, or vise versa. Some things we never thought we'd like, we now love or vise versa.

Are there things you've run across in fandom that have changed your personal moral code I mean mostly in regards to relationships, but you can include other aspects as well. Also, if you like something in fandom/fanfic, does that mean you'd accept it in RL? Or do you draw a line between fiction and reality?

I mean, there are a lot of people in fandom who read incest fic, if you came across an incestuous couple in RL, would you be ok with it? What about things other than incest? I know my first change way back in my early days of fandom was to finally see that an open relationship could work, if both partners wanted it. Or later, that threesomes, or moresomes could work. I grew up in a very traditional household, where mostly, it's expected for a girl to meet a guy, fall in love and get married, so seeing all of the other kinds of relationships out there really changed my view on these things, and moved some things off my moral codes list of "wrong".

[identity profile] equusentric.livejournal.com 2008-04-06 06:11 pm (UTC)(link)
I've had the opposite happen, actually. As I've gotten older and my life experience influences my world view, I've started to accept more things in what I read. To use your example, I didn't used to read threesome/moresome fic because I have a very ingrained sense of OTP-ness that didn't used to allow for additions of any kind. Once I'd actually experienced a threesome for myself, I gained more understanding of how they work, at least with a casual third, so I began to read those types of stories because they ceased being threatening to my OTPness.

As you know from my incest post, RL incest is not objectionable to me as long as it's between consensual adults. It might squick me and I wouldn't want the details (the het versions) but otherwise it would be none of my business.

I do, however, have things that I like/accept in fanfic that I don't condone in real life. One of the things that I like about reading as opposed to watching is that I can run the events through my own personal filter. While I certainly enjoy watching porn when I'm in the mood for it, reading it is more enjoyable to me because it's "cleaner." In my mind, there's no mess or weirdness and any detail I don't like I can sort of skim over and not really register it as part of the experience. It's the same with other aspects of fic, in my case non-con or extreme "whump."

I don't like violence for its own sake, but I am a total sucker for hurt/comfort fic and in that context violence/non-con provides a very emotional hurt factor that can lead to even more emotional comfort, and for me, emotion in everything in fic. It's why I read it. Plus that handy filter in my head keeps the mental pictures/sounds in check enough that while I "feel" the hurt, it's kept on the surface and doesn't give me nightmares. I can't watch violence like I can read it -- that Sheppard whump vid everyone was squeeing over? I stopped watching after the first minute -- and I most certainly do NOT condone assault or rape in real life.

Then there's the stuff I like in fic that can't really happen in real life, but that's a different topic altogether.

[identity profile] equusentric.livejournal.com 2008-04-07 02:01 pm (UTC)(link)
Chan is one of those grey areas for me. It mostly depends on how young the character is. I know how I felt sexually as a late teen and what I did. My absolute lowest age for penetrative sex is 16. I can do 14 for mutual masturbation and oral, but only if I really like the pairing and if the other participant is also a teenager, because that's seriously skirting the line for me and anything younger I just can't do. I quit reading Piers Anthony's novels for that reason.

Mpreg squicks me the HELL OUT. It just really, really does. I can hardly handle babies coming out of women. :P

My thing is sentient nonhuman sex. Sex with aliens or human hybrids or highly evolved AIs. Well, I reckon the last one might be possible in RL someday, but anyway. Technically, sex with aliens happens whenever someone has sex with Teyla or Ronon, but I'm talking about nonhuman physiognomy. I can eat Bug!John fics for breakfast, and that one fic where John was a centaur? *rowr* This is not to be confused with bestiality, since animals are not sentient and can't give consent, and therefore goes on my squick list. And then there's wingfic, which I always thought sounded really stupid until I got into SGA, and now the thought of John having wings is just really, really hot.

[identity profile] equusentric.livejournal.com 2008-04-07 07:28 pm (UTC)(link)
Even with the technology, mpreg is just too weird for me. Maybe it has a lot to do with my disinterest with babies in general. I don't see the point of going so far as to make a man pregnant just to work a baby into the story. It just seems like needless reaching to me, and it makes me very :| The ONLY mpreg I've been able to handle was on Alien Nation, but then George is an alien so it isn't quite the same thing. Now, there was a person who attempted to write a Brian/Justin mpreg AU by making Justin a Newcomer, but it was painfully obvious that she'd never watched Alien Nation because she didn't get a single detail right.

My love for bug!John knows no bounds. There was a fic someone wrote, I think it was either sardonicsmiley or lavvyan, where John kept getting switched out every day with a John from another universe, and the first switch-out was bug!John, and oh my word that bit of the story just kept breaking my heart and putting it back just to break it again. I wish she'd write a full story in that verse. It would be awesome.

And I read Leah's centaur fic. Where is this other centaur fic of which you speak?? *makes grabby hands*

[identity profile] scatterheart.livejournal.com 2008-04-06 07:26 pm (UTC)(link)
Thinking about it, my personal moral code or kinks/squicks have never been (significantly) changed due to fandom. I've been very open in regards to sexual practices for as long as I can remember, so I never had many real squicks to begin with. Those I do have - scat, bestiality, non-con, mostly - have not changed.

I do draw lines between real life and fiction mostly when it comes to consent, not so much to practices. Fiction, in my opinion, is fiction for a reason - I fully support everyone's right to write (and read) what they want, even if it's something I personally find objectable. So as long as they warn properly, allowing someone who doesn't want to read something a way to avoid it, anything goes. Obviously that is not the case in real life (including photography or movies, i.e. things actually involving living beings). To stick with the example of incest, I don't mind it in fiction, but it's a more difficult issue in real life. I don't believe it's inherently bad if blood relatives are romantically involved/ sleep with each other (strange, yes, but whatever). However, there is such a huge problem with (full and informed) consent in real life incest, since family relationships (especially if they're cross-gen) have such inherent power dynamics, that I wouldn't approve of them under many circumstances.

Dub-con is similar, it can be hot in fiction, but is an absolute no-no in real life.

... I'm trying to formulate a good conclusion to my thoughts, but yeah, that's pretty much it. :)

[identity profile] tacky-tramp.livejournal.com 2008-04-06 11:12 pm (UTC)(link)
Nope. My moral code has been, for quite a while, "honesty and consent is good, deceit and coercion is wrong." Consensual adult incest weirds me out, but I really don't consider it any of my business. Some of my fictional kinks, though, I do consider wrong IRL, like chan and dubcon.

Morality in fic

[identity profile] paradise-city.livejournal.com 2008-04-08 04:50 am (UTC)(link)
Since we talked about this already I don't know if you want more of my thoughts, but I'll give them anyway.

I definitely draw a line between things that are okay in fic and things that are okay outside of fic (mostly age and non-con), but it all depends on the people and circumstances involved so my judgments aren't really generalizable across fic and non-fic.

In terms of age, I know I mentioned that I don't really have a problem with underage sex, but it depends on the individual. I know what my peers and I were getting up when we were 12 or 13 and while some people came away scarred from the experiences, I think the majority of us were much more cognizant about what were getting into than people gave us credit for and are no worse for the wear. So while I might not have an issue with Person A having sex at 14 because I know person A and think he or she can handle it, I'm probably not okay with Harry having sex with Snape because Harry's never been a sexual person and probably can't handle it.

As far as non-con goes, I think there are degrees in fic (a fic where Person A is in a relationship with Person B and while Person B may get a little demanding or take liberties, Person A never gives an indication he or she wants Person B to stop versus Person A being full-on raped by a sadistic torturer) and the lighter stuff can be okay with me. Outside fic, however, I am staunchly anti-non-con in any form. We were talking about this in one of my classes the other day (I can't recall if I talked about this with you or not, so my apologies if it's a repeat), and our discussion of what does and does not constitute rape included things like Person A having sex with Person B even when Person A doesn't want to just to keep the peace of make Person B happy at his or her own expense. I think anyone being harassed for sex after saying no, no matter how mildly, is intolerable. But John taking liberties with Rodney is probably okay, because I don't think John is likely to be a rapist nor Rodney likely to be a rape victim.

So I guess the short answer is that my morality doesn't necessarily differ between fic and non-fic, but the caveats do. It all depends on circumstances and individuals.

Great post. I've really enjoyed reading others' thought on this. :)